For an accessibility improvement plan, there is no prescribed form that you download and fill in from somewhere. What must be included is in practice always the same: an overview of the problems found, for each problem who is responsible, and for each problem a date when it will be resolved. Without that third column, an improvement plan is just a list of good intentions, and that is precisely the detail that matters on this subject.
The reason deadlines carry so much weight is that an improvement plan is not intended as a snapshot but as proof of a process. A supervisory authority or a customer asking for it wants to see not only that you know where the problems are, but also that there is a realistic timeline to resolve them. A plan without dates cannot be distinguished from a mere finding, and that undermines the entire purpose of the document.
What the improvement plan is based on
The basis of every improvement plan is a list of findings. These can be the results of an automated scan, of manual spot checks, or of reports that come in from users. What matters is that those findings are traceable: which page or which screen, which WCAG criterion, and on what basis was it determined that something does not conform. A scan like axessia's provides that first part, but does not cover everything; parts that cannot be automatically tested should be separately noted in the report, so that your improvement plan does not blindly build on incomplete data. Those still needing to determine where the greatest problems lie can have it checked in a few minutes before the plan is drawn up.
Prioritization: not everything at once
Alongside the findings themselves, the plan should include a prioritization. Not every problem carries equal weight: a checkout process that cannot be navigated with a screen reader affects more users than a missing alt text on a decorative image. A prioritized list shows that thought has been given to impact, and not just to what happens to be easiest to fix. That prioritization should be a separate section in the plan, distinct from the bare technical findings.
Ownership: who does what
A third element is ownership. At a small business, that is sometimes one person responsible for everything; at a larger organization, responsibility is often spread across the web developer, the marketing department, and the person who manages content. An improvement plan without an owner for each item risks no one feeling concretely responsible for it, and that is different from a list that looks legally complete but sits idle in practice.
Recording and keeping
Finally, it is wise for the plan to exist not only at the moment it is drawn up, but also to be updated as soon as a point is resolved or a deadline shifts. An improvement plan is thus a living document, not a one-time exercise. Those who prefer not to maintain this in a loose spreadsheet will find in the knowledge base worked out by subject how other obligations, such as the statement and self-assessment, relate to the improvement plan and where they overlap.
What axessia does and does not do in this regard
Axessia tests, prioritizes and records, but does not draw up an improvement plan for you and does not carry out the repair work. What the platform does provide is the translation of scan results into a prioritized list in plain language, with templates to fill in and record ownership and deadlines yourselves. How that information is produced and which part remains automated and which part manual is explained on the page about our methodology. For the costs of a subscription with those templates and country-specific sections, you can see the view current prices.
For your own situation, and for the question of whether a particular issue is legally significant enough to be addressed with priority, a legal advisor or the competent supervisory authority remains the appropriate point of contact. If you first want to know where your website or app currently stands, the free quick-scan is a logical starting point, followed by the choice to convert the findings into a plan with deadlines that are based on substantive criteria.